OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

--- Clinical Tools

Logo
OpiCalc
ABC-AF Bleeding ScoreABC-AF Stroke ScoreABCD2 ScoreADD-RSAortic Valve Calcium ScoreAPPLE ScoreASCVD (Pooled Cohort)AVA (Continuity Equation)BAG-AHF ScoreBiplane Simpson EFBlood Pressure PercentilesBrugada Criteria (VT vs SVT)Cardiac Output IndexCHA2DS2-VAScCHADS2Cornell Voltage CriteriaCRUSADE Bleeding ScoreDAPT ScoreDASIDuke Treadmill ScoreE/A RatioEDACS ScoreEHMRGEHRA ScoreEmbolic Risk ScoreEROA (PISA Method)EuroSCORE IIFFR (Fractional Flow Reserve)Fick Cardiac OutputFramingham 10-Year RiskFriedewald LDL EquationGorlin EquationGRACE ScoreGupta MICA (NSQIP)GWTG-HF ScoreH2FPEF ScoreHakki FormulaHAS-BLEDHEART PathwayHEART ScoreHEMORR2HAGEShs-Troponin 0h/1h ESC AlgorithmiFRINTERCHEST ScoreKillip ClassificationLee's RCRILV Mass IndexLV Stroke Work IndexMAGGIC Risk ScoreMAP CalculatorMartin/Hopkins LDLModified Duke CriteriaModified Sgarbossa CriteriaMVA (Pressure Half-Time)Non-HDL CholesterolNT-proBNP Age-Adjusted ThresholdsORBIT ScoreOttawa Heart Failure RiskPulse PressurePVR CalculatorPVR IndexQRISK3QTc (Bazett)QTc (Fridericia)REVEAL 2.0 ScoreReynolds Risk ScoreROSIRVSP CalculatorSchwartz Score (LQTS)SCORE2Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)Sgarbossa CriteriaShock IndexSokolow-Lyon VoltageStroke Volume IndexSVR CalculatorSYNTAX ScoreSYNTAX Score IITAPSETeichholz FormulaTIMI (STEMI)TIMI (UA/NSTEMI)Troponin Delta CalculatorValvular GradientsVancouver Chest Pain RuleVereckei AlgorithmWATCHDM ScoreWilkins ScoreWood Units Calculator

Clinical Evidence and Methodology

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Clinical Reference Hub

Curated insights • How it Works • Practical Pearls • Evidence Base

CLINICAL INSIGHT

When to Use

When to Use

  • Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
  • Used to identify a cohort of patients at sufficiently low risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) to be safely discharged at 2 hours

Do Not Use If

Patient has unequivocal ongoing ischemia, dynamic ECG changes, hemodynamic instability, or another emergent cause for chest pain (e.g., aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism).

CLINICAL INSIGHT

How it Works

Scoring Logic

The EDACS (Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score) incorporates age, sex, risk factors, and classical symptom presentation to calculate risk. Notably, elements that make ACS *less* likely (pain with inspiration, pain on palpation) subtract points.

Integrating with Troponin

  • 1. Calculate the EDACS score. A score < 16 identifies the patient as "Low Risk".
  • 2. Obtain an ECG. It must show NO new ischemia.
  • 3. Obtain a high-sensitivity troponin at 0-hour and 2-hours. Both must be normal/negative according to local assay thresholds.
  • 4. If all three criteria (EDACS < 16, normal ECG, negative 0h/2h trops) are met, the patient is safe for early discharge.
CLINICAL INSIGHT

Practical Pearls

EDACS vs HEART Score

While the HEART score uses the physician's subjective assessment of the chest pain history ("highly suspicious", "moderately suspicious"), EDACS relies on explicitly defined symptoms (diaphoresis, radiation). This makes EDACS more objective and potentially more reproducible, particularly for less experienced clinicians.

Efficiency

Studies comparing EDACS to the ADAPT protocol (incorporating TIMI) and HEART pathway have consistently shown that EDACS identifies a higher proportion of patients (up to 40-50%) as safe for early discharge without missing additional MACE.

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Evidence Base

Original Derivation

Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol.

Than M, Flaws D, Sanders S, et al.Emerg Med Australas.2014

Large-scale Validation

Performance of the EDACS-ADP in a Large Community-based Cohort.

Mark DG, Huang J, Chettipally U, et al.Ann Emerg Med.2018
CLINICAL INSIGHT

Next Steps

Complementary Calculators

EDACS Score

EDACS Score: Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score. Identifies patients safe for 2-hour early discharge.

45 years
Sex
Age 18-50 AND (known CAD or ≥3 risk factors)
Diaphoresis
Pain radiates to arm, shoulder, neck, or jaw
Pain worsened by inspiration (-4 pts)
Pain reproduced by palpation (-6 pts)
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Clinical Reference Hub

Curated insights • How it Works • Practical Pearls • Evidence Base

CLINICAL INSIGHT

When to Use

When to Use

  • Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
  • Used to identify a cohort of patients at sufficiently low risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) to be safely discharged at 2 hours

Do Not Use If

Patient has unequivocal ongoing ischemia, dynamic ECG changes, hemodynamic instability, or another emergent cause for chest pain (e.g., aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism).

CLINICAL INSIGHT

How it Works

Scoring Logic

The EDACS (Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score) incorporates age, sex, risk factors, and classical symptom presentation to calculate risk. Notably, elements that make ACS *less* likely (pain with inspiration, pain on palpation) subtract points.

Integrating with Troponin

  • 1. Calculate the EDACS score. A score < 16 identifies the patient as "Low Risk".
  • 2. Obtain an ECG. It must show NO new ischemia.
  • 3. Obtain a high-sensitivity troponin at 0-hour and 2-hours. Both must be normal/negative according to local assay thresholds.
  • 4. If all three criteria (EDACS < 16, normal ECG, negative 0h/2h trops) are met, the patient is safe for early discharge.
CLINICAL INSIGHT

Practical Pearls

EDACS vs HEART Score

While the HEART score uses the physician's subjective assessment of the chest pain history ("highly suspicious", "moderately suspicious"), EDACS relies on explicitly defined symptoms (diaphoresis, radiation). This makes EDACS more objective and potentially more reproducible, particularly for less experienced clinicians.

Efficiency

Studies comparing EDACS to the ADAPT protocol (incorporating TIMI) and HEART pathway have consistently shown that EDACS identifies a higher proportion of patients (up to 40-50%) as safe for early discharge without missing additional MACE.

CLINICAL INSIGHT

Evidence Base

Original Derivation

Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol.

Than M, Flaws D, Sanders S, et al.Emerg Med Australas.2014

Large-scale Validation

Performance of the EDACS-ADP in a Large Community-based Cohort.

Mark DG, Huang J, Chettipally U, et al.Ann Emerg Med.2018
CLINICAL INSIGHT

Next Steps

Complementary Calculators