Comparative Pharmacology
Head-to-head clinical analysis: MS CONTIN versus OPANA ER.
Peer-Reviewed Evidence
Head-to-head clinical analysis: MS CONTIN versus OPANA ER.
MS CONTIN vs OPANA ER
Comparing the clinical profiles, pharmacokinetic behaviors, and safety indices of these two therapeutic agents.
Mu-opioid receptor agonist; binds to mu-opioid receptors in the CNS, modulating pain perception and emotional response to pain.
Opana ER (oxymorphone hydrochloride) is a full opioid agonist with relative selectivity for the mu-opioid receptor, although it can interact with other opioid receptors at higher doses. The principal therapeutic action is analgesia via activation of mu-opioid receptors in the central nervous system, leading to altered perception and response to pain.
Oral: 15-30 mg every 8-12 hours; adjust based on pain severity and prior opioid use. Extended-release tablets must be swallowed whole; do not crush or chew. For opioid-naïve patients, start at 15 mg every 12 hours.
Initial: 5 mg orally every 12 hours; titrate by 5-10 mg every 12 hours every 3-7 days; maximum 40 mg every 12 hours.
None Documented
None Documented
Terminal elimination half-life: 11-13 hours (range 8-24 hours). In elderly or hepatic impairment, half-life may be prolonged; acute dosing half-life ~2-4 hours.
Terminal elimination half-life: 11.1–13.8 hours; clinically relevant as steady-state achieved in 2–3 days
Renal: ~90% (mostly as morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, with ~10% as unchanged morphine); Fecal: <10%
Renal (primarily as glucuronide conjugates and unchanged drug): 85-90%; Fecal: <10%
Category C
Category C
Opioid Analgesic
Opioid Analgesic