Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

Quick Access

Favorites
Most Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
Clinical CalculatorsDrugsGuidelines
SpecsDrugsGuides
Canadian C-Spine RuleHEART ScoreOttawa Ankle RulesPERC RuleWells Criteria (PE)
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2026

•

All Rights Reserved

HEART Score

HEART Score: Validated chest pain triage tool for Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE).
Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

When to Use

When to Use

Stratifying risk for patients presenting to the emergency department with undifferentiated chest pain of suspected cardiac origin
Predicting the 6-week risk of a Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE: acute myocardial infarction, PCI, CABG, or death)
Determining the safety of early ED discharge versus the need for prolonged observation, serial troponins, or admission
Guiding resource allocation in chest pain units

Patient Population

Adult ED patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain suspicious for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). It explicitly excludes patients presenting with new ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), extreme hemodynamic instability, or those with a clearly obvious non-cardiac cause of pain (e.g., tension pneumothorax, severe trauma).

How it Works

Scoring Variables

History: Highly suspicious (2 points), Moderately suspicious (1 point), Slightly or non-suspicious (0 points)
ECG: Significant ST depression (2 points), Non-specific repolarization disturbances / LBBB / PM (1 point), Normal (0 points)
Age: ≥65 years (2 points), 45–64 years (1 point), <45 years (0 points)
Risk Factors: ≥3 risk factors or history of atherosclerotic disease (2 points), 1-2 risk factors (1 point), No risk factors (0 points)
Initial Troponin: ≥3x normal limit (2 points), 1-3x normal limit (1 point), ≤normal limit (0 points)

Interpretation Thresholds

Score 0–3Low Risk: 0.9–1.7% risk of MACE at 6 weeks. Often safe for early ED discharge without stress testing.
Score 4–6Moderate Risk: 12–16.6% risk of MACE. Admit for observation, serial troponins, and provocative testing.
Score 7–10High Risk: 50–65% risk of MACE. Consider early invasive strategy and admission to cardiology.

Clinical Pearls

Clinical Pearl

The HEART score deliberately incorporates clinician gestalt via the "History" component, which makes it significantly better at identifying truly low-risk ED patients compared to the TIMI and GRACE scores.

Known Limitations

The "History" component is inherently subjective and prone to inter-rater variability depending on the clinician’s experience.
Validated primarily in populations using standard contemporary troponin assays; institutions using high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) algorithms often use modified pathways (e.g., the HEART-Pathway).
Can erroneously classify patients as low risk if an initially normal troponin later trends rapidly upward, emphasizing the need for serial testing if presentation is early.
Not designed to predict non-cardiac causes of mortality such as aortic dissection or pulmonary embolism.

Next Steps

Actionable Clinical Management

01
1. Low Risk (0-3): Discharge home with strict return precautions and arrange primary care follow-up. Do not order routine provocative testing in the ED.
02
2. Moderate Risk (4-6): Admit to a chest pain observation unit. Perform serial troponin testing at 0 and 3 hours. If negative, consider non-invasive testing (stress echo, CCTA) prior to discharge.
03
3. High Risk (7-10): Admit to a cardiology unit or CCU. Initiate medical management for ACS (antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, statin) and consult interventional cardiology for urgent coronary angiography.
04
4. Always reconsider alternative deadly diagnoses (PE, dissection) if the patient deteriorates despite medical therapy.

The Evidence

Derivation Study

Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.

Six AJ et al. • Neth Heart J.. 2008;Vol 16(6): 191-196. The foundational paper demonstrating the superiority of the HEART score over TIMI and GRACE for undifferentiated ED chest pain.

Origins & History

Development Context

Developed in the Netherlands in 2008 by Dr. A.J. Six, Dr. B.E. Backus, and colleagues as a practical, ED-focused tool. It was designed specifically to address the deficiencies of the TIMI and GRACE scores, which were derived from previously diagnosed ACS populations rather than an undifferentiated ED cohort.

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17

Recent Journal Updates

JAMAJul 21, 2026
Correction to Primary Composite Outcome in a Trial of Transfusion Strategy

Clinical Context

We think this might be relevant to the clinical guidance for HEART Score — Chest Pain Risk Stratification.

Cancer MedicineJul 16, 2026
Notch3/4 Knockdown Inhibits Colon Adenocarcinoma Progression by Suppressing Tumor Cell Activity and Orchestrating VEGFA‐Dependent Tumor Immune Microenvironment

Clinical Context

We think this might be relevant to the clinical guidance for HEART Score — Chest Pain Risk Stratification.

FDA MedWatchJul 2, 2026
Heart Pump Recall: Abiomed Removes Impella CP Sets with SmartAssist

Clinical Context

We think this might be relevant to the clinical guidance for HEART Score — Chest Pain Risk Stratification.