Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

Quick Access

Favorites
Most Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
Clinical CalculatorsDrugsGuidelines
SpecsDrugsGuides
AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot ScoreASES Shoulder ScoreConstant-Murley ScoreDASH ScoreFAAM ScoreFRAX ScoreHOOS ScoreHarris Hip ScoreIKDC Knee ScoreKOOS ScoreLysholm Knee ScoreMayo Elbow Performance ScoreNeck Disability IndexOswestry Disability IndexOttawa RulesOxford Knee ScoreQuickDASH ScoreRowe Shoulder Instability ScoreSPADI Shoulder ScoreTegner Activity ScaleUCLA Shoulder ScoreVTE Risk (Caprini)WOMAC Score
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2026

•

All Rights Reserved

Recent Journal Updates

WHO NewsJul 2, 2026
WHO adds first diagnostic test for Ebola Bundibugyo virus to its Emergency Use Listing

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to Harris Hip Score.

BJOGJun 25, 2026
Indications and Efficacy of Progestogen‐Monotherapy as Menopause Hormone Therapy: A Narrative Review

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to Harris Hip Score.

Harris Hip Score (HHS) Calculator

What is the Harris Hip Score?

The Harris Hip Score (HHS) is a widely recognized clinical instrument used to assess the outcomes of hip surgery and various hip disabilities in adults. Developed in 1969 by Dr. William H. Harris, it remains a gold standard for evaluating functional success after total hip arthroplasty (THA), femoral neck fractures, and management of hip osteoarthritis.

HHS Domains and Scoring Mechanism

The calculator utilizes a 100-point scale divided into four specific domains to provide a comprehensive view of patient function and comfort:

  • Pain (44 points): Evaluates the severity of pain and its impact on the patient's daily life and medication requirements.
  • Function (47 points): Split between gait (limp, support, distance) and activities of daily living (stairs, socks/shoes, sitting, public transport).
  • Absence of Deformity (4 points): Awarded for meeting specific clinical criteria (flexion contracture < 30°, fixed abduction < 10°, internal rotation < 10°, and limb length discrepancy < 3.2 cm).
  • Range of Motion (5 points): Calculated based on degrees of flexion, abduction, adduction, and rotation.

Interpreting the HHS Results

Clinical outcomes are categorized based on the total score:

  • 90 – 100: Excellent
  • 80 – 89: Good
  • 70 – 79: Fair
  • Below 70: Poor

Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS)

The Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) is a derivative that excludes the physical examination components (Deformity and ROM), relying solely on patient-reported data for pain and function. This version is particularly useful for remote monitoring and tele-health follow-ups.

Clinical Validity and References

The HHS has demonstrated high inter-rater reliability (r = 0.94) and is highly responsive to clinical changes in the early post-operative period. However, clinicians should be aware of "ceiling effects" in high-functioning patients long-term.

Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):737-55.Mahomed NN, et al. The Harris hip score: Comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(5):575-80.

Harris Hip Score

Harris Hip Score Calculator

Validated Post-THA Instrument (HHS)

Pain Severity

Impact on activities & medication

Function: Gait

Limp, Support, and Distance

Activities of Daily Living

Stairs, Sitting, and Mobility

Public Transport?

Absence of Deformity

4 Points Awarded

Range of Motion

Flexion (max 140°)140°
Abduction (max 40°)40°
Adduction (max 40°)40°
Ext. Rotation (max 40°)40°
Int. Rotation (max 40°)40°
Total Index300°
Points5
Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

When to Use

When to Use

Pre-operative and post-operative assessment of total hip arthroplasty (THA)
Functional outcome measurement following hip fracture fixation
Long-term follow-up of hip preservation procedures
Comparison of outcomes across different surgical approaches and implants
Clinical trials evaluating hip surgery interventions
Serial monitoring of hip function during rehabilitation

Patient Population

Designed for adults undergoing hip surgery, particularly THA. Validated across diverse age groups and etiologies including osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and hip fracture.

How it Works

Formula

Total Score = Pain (44) + Function (47) + Deformity (4) + ROM (5) = 100 Pain (44 pts): None/Ignores (44), Slight (40), Mild (30), Moderate (20), Marked (10), Disabled (0) Gait (33 pts): Limp (11) + Support (11) + Distance Walked (11) ADL (14 pts): Stairs (4) + Shoes/Socks (4) + Sitting (5) + Transport (1) Deformity (4 pts): Four corrective criteria must all be met for 4 points Range of Motion (5 pts): Based on total arc of hip motion, max 5 points at >210° ROM Index = Flexion + Abduction + Adduction + External Rotation + Internal Rotation

Range of Motion Scoring

Total ArcPoints
> 210°5
161° – 210°4
101° – 160°3
61° – 100°2
31° – 60°1
0° – 30°0

Clinical Pearls

Interpretation Guide

Score RangeClassificationClinical Implication
90 – 100ExcellentNear-normal hip function; satisfied patient
80 – 89GoodMild limitations; adequate for daily activities
70 – 79FairModerate impairment; may need activity modifications
< 70PoorSignificant disability; consider revision workup

Key Considerations

The HHS is heavily weighted toward pain (44%), making it sensitive to analgesia
Ceiling effects are common in well-performing THA patients (scores 90-100)
The ROM component contributes only 5% of total score — prioritize pain and function history
Inter-rater reliability improves with structured interview rather than patient self-report
A change of 10 points is considered the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)

Common Pitfalls

Do not skip the deformity assessment — all four criteria must be checked
ROM measurements should use a goniometer with standardized positioning
Transport question (public transport use) may not apply in all clinical settings

Next Steps

Clinical Actions

01
Interpret score using the classification thresholds (Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor)
02
If score < 70: investigate for implant loosening, infection, or component malposition
03
If score 70-79: optimize non-operative management; consider physical therapy
04
Compare to pre-operative baseline to quantify surgical benefit
05
Trend scores over time — a declining score warrants diagnostic workup
06
Document in clinical notes for medicolegal and outcome registry purposes

The Evidence

Primary Reference

Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty

Harris WH • Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 1969;51(4):737-755 — Original description of the Harris Hip Score

Validation Evidence

Test-retest reliability: ICC 0.94-0.95
Inter-observer reliability: ICC 0.90-0.94
MCID: 10 points (range 8-15 depending on population)
Responsiveness: Large effect size (Cohen's d > 1.0) at 6 months post-THA
Correlation with SF-36: r = 0.60-0.75 for physical function domains

Origins & History

Historical Background

The Harris Hip Score was developed by Dr. William H. Harris, a pioneering hip surgeon at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital. First published in 1969, it remains the most widely used hip-specific outcome instrument in orthopedic surgery.

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17