Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

Quick Access

Favorites
Most Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
Clinical CalculatorsDrugsGuidelines
SpecsDrugsGuides
APGAR ScoreAssisted Delivery (FIGO)BPP (Manning Score)Bishop ScoreCARPREG II Cardiac RiskCervical Cancer StagingContraceptive Pearl IndexDoppler Matrix (UA/MCA)EFW (Hadlock)Endometrial StagingEndometrial ThicknessFGR Criteria (Consensus)FSFI (Sexual Function)Ferriman-Gallwey ScoreFetal Anemia (MCA PSV)GDM Diagnostic CriteriaGPA History IndicatorGail Model Breast RiskGestational Dating (LMP)HIV PMTCT ProtocolIOTA Simple RulesIVF Due Date & AMHIron Deficit (Ganzoni)Labour Progress (WHO)Maternal Sepsis (qSOFA)O-RADS ClassificationOvarian Cancer StagingPAS Hemorrhage RiskPPH Protocol (FIGO)Preeclampsia (ACOG)Rho(D) Dose (K-B)Rotterdam PCOS CriteriaSyphilis ManagementTORCH FrameworkVBAC Success ProbabilityVulvar Cancer StagingWeight Gain (IOM)mWHO Cardiac Risk
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2026

•

All Rights Reserved

Bishop Score

BishopCervical Ripeness Assessment

Pelvic Examination

Used to determine if cervical ripening (e.g. prostaglandins, Foley balloon) is indicated prior to induction of labor with oxytocin.

Bishop Calculator

Select a value for all 5 pelvic examination findings to view the total score and interpretation.

Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

When to Use

Primary Clinical Uses

Assessing cervical readiness for labor in term pregnancies
Predicting the likelihood of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor
Determining whether cervical ripening agents (e.g., prostaglandins) are needed prior to oxytocin administration

Target Population

Originally validated for multiparous, term women considering elective induction. Now broadly used for indicated inductions (e.g., hypertension, FGR) in both nulliparous and multiparous populations.

How it Works

Scoring Variables

Dilation (cm)0 (0) | 1–2 (1) | 3–4 (2) | ≥5 (3)
Effacement (%)0–30% (0) | 40–50% (1) | 60–70% (2) | ≥80% (3)
Station (cm)-3 (0) | -2 (1) | -1 or 0 (2) | +1 or +2 (3)
ConsistencyFirm (0) | Medium (1) | Soft (2)
PositionPosterior (0) | Mid (1) | Anterior (2)

Simplified Bishop Score (The "New" Standard)

Research suggests that only 3 variables (Dilation, Effacement, and Station) are as predictive as the full 5-variable score. A Simplified Bishop Score ≥ 5 is considered favorable for induction.

Mnemonic

"Call PEDS For Parturition": Cervical Position, Effacement, Dilation, Softness (Consistency), and Fetal Station.

Clinical Pearls

The Nulliparous Threshold

For first-time mothers (nulliparous), a higher Bishop Score (≥8) is typically required to predict a successful induction compared to multiparous patients (≥6).

Clinical Pearls

Cervical length via ultrasound < 25-30mm is equivalent to a "favorable" Bishop score.
A low score (<6) does not mean a vaginal delivery is impossible; it simply means the induction will take longer (frequently >24 hours) and likely requires ripening.
The digital exam should be performed between contractions for the most accurate assessment of station and dilation.

Known Limitations

High inter-observer variability (±1 cm difference in dilation/station is common).
Poor correlation with successful induction in obese patients (BMI >30).
Does not account for fetal weight or position (occiput posterior/transverse).

Next Steps

Score ≥ 8 — Favorable Cervix

01
High probability of successful vaginal delivery with induction
02
Cervical ripening agents are generally unnecessary
03
Induction of labor using oxytocin and/or amniotomy is appropriate

Score ≤ 6 — Unfavorable Cervix

01
Cervical ripening is indicated prior to standard labor induction
02
Consider mechanical methods (e.g., Foley balloon catheter)
03
Consider pharmacological methods (e.g., prostaglandins like misoprostol or dinoprostone)
04
Re-assess the Bishop score after the ripening intervention

The Evidence

Derivation Study

Pelvic scoring for elective induction.

Bishop EH. • Obstet Gynecol.. 1964;Aug;24:266-8. Evaluated 500 multiparous women at term to find objective, standardized criteria to replace subjective "gut feelings" about induction readiness.

Origins & History

Dr. Edward Bishop

Developed by Dr. Edward Bishop in 1964. He sought to create a standardized point system to replace subjective clinical intuition when determining if a woman was ready for elective induction of labor.

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17

Recent Journal Updates

British J HaematologyJul 22, 2026
Adjusted delivery, stronger outcomes: Selinexor therapeutic adaptation and positioning in previously treated multiple myeloma

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to Bishop Score.

JAMAJul 21, 2026
National Trends in Patient Messaging

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to Bishop Score.

WHO NewsJul 20, 2026
Road deaths fall by 21% globally but stronger action is needed to save lives

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to Bishop Score.