OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

989 Clinical Tools

Logo
OpiCalc
APGAR ScoreAssisted Delivery (FIGO)BPP (Manning Score)Bishop ScoreCARPREG II Cardiac RiskCervical Cancer StagingContraceptive Pearl IndexDoppler Matrix (UA/MCA)EFW (Hadlock)Endometrial StagingEndometrial ThicknessFGR Criteria (Consensus)FSFI (Sexual Function)Ferriman-Gallwey ScoreFetal Anemia (MCA PSV)GDM Diagnostic CriteriaGPA History IndicatorGail Model Breast RiskGestational Dating (LMP)HIV PMTCT ProtocolIOTA Simple RulesIVF Due Date & AMHIron Deficit (Ganzoni)Labour Progress (WHO)Maternal Sepsis (qSOFA)O-RADS ClassificationOvarian Cancer StagingPAS Hemorrhage RiskPPH Protocol (FIGO)Preeclampsia (ACOG)Rho(D) Dose (K-B)Rotterdam PCOS CriteriaSyphilis ManagementTORCH FrameworkVBAC Success ProbabilityVulvar Cancer StagingWeight Gain (IOM)mWHO Cardiac Risk
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Open-access clinical infrastructure. Built to the standard every clinician deserves — fast, private, and free.

Zero data stored
Always free
Our mission & transparency

Get in Touch

Tool request, clinical feedback, or partnership inquiry — we read everything.

WhatsApp feedback
Email us
Partnership inquiry

© 2026 OpiCalc • Calculated Care

ProtocolsAboutPrivacyTerms

IOTA Simple Rules

IOTA Simple Rules

International Ovarian Tumor Analysis

Benign Features (B-Rules)
Malignant Features (M-Rules)

IOTA Conclusion

INCONCLUSIVE / UNCLASSIFIED

Simple Rules can classify ~75% of masses. Masses that don't fit (neither or both types) should be analyzed using IOTA ADNEX / Specialist assessment.

Guidelines & Evidence

Clinical Details

Section 1

When to Use

Primary Clinical Uses

Sonographic characterization of adnexal/ovarian masses
Triaging surgical referrals (general gynecology vs. gynecologic oncology)
Standardizing global ultrasound terminology regarding ovarian cysts

Why it Exists

Prior to IOTA, radiologists used highly subjective terminology ("complex", "worrisome", "thickened") that caused massive over-operation by oncologists for universally benign cysts, and accidental rupture of malignant cysts by generalists.
Section 2

Formula & Logic

B-Features (Benign)

B1: Unilocular
B2: Presence of solid components, but largest is < 7 mm
B3: Presence of acoustic shadows (classic for dermoids)
B4: Smooth multilocular tumor with largest diameter < 100 mm
B5: No blood flow on Doppler (Color Score 1)

M-Features (Malignant)

M1: Irregular solid tumor
M2: Presence of ascites
M3: At least 4 papillary structures
M4: Irregular multilocular solid tumor with largest diameter ≥ 100 mm
M5: Very strong blood flow on Doppler (Color Score 4)
Section 3

Pearls/Pitfalls

The Diagnostic Algorithm

Rule 1 (Benign): Must have at least one B-feature AND zero M-features.
Rule 2 (Malignant): Must have at least one M-feature AND zero B-features.
Rule 3 (Inconclusive): If it has both B and M features, or NEITHER, the rules do not apply.

Inconclusive Masses

The Simple Rules are highly accurate (~90-95%) but only applicable to about 76% of all adnexal masses.
For the ~24% that are inconclusive, you MUST defer to an expert ultrasound examiner, an MRI, or apply advanced mathematical models (like IOTA ADNEX).
Section 4

Next Steps

Clinical Triage

01
Benign: Safe for conservative management, surveillance, or cystectomy/oophorectomy by a general gynecologist depending on symptoms.
02
Malignant: Absolute requirement for referral to a trained Gynecologic Oncologist. Attempting surgery by a generalist risks capsule rupture, upgrading the staging and ruining survival odds.
03
Inconclusive: Escalate diagnostic imaging (Pelvic MRI with contrast) or utilize the continuous ADNEX model.
Section 5

Evidence Appraisal

Phase 2 IOTA Study

Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.

Timmerman D et al. • Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.. 2008;Developed the 10 rules using 1938 women, proving a 95% sensitivity and 91% specificity for the masses where the rules could be conclusively applied.

Section 6

Literature

The IOTA Group

The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) consortium revolutionized ultrasound. Rather than relying on tumor markers like CA-125 (which has catastrophic false positive rates in premenopausal women due to endometriosis), they forced objective morphology to dictate risk.

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026

Related Obstetrics Tools

Cervical Cancer Staging
Contraceptive Pearl Index
Doppler Matrix
EFW
Endometrial Staging
Endometrial Thickness
Ferriman-Gallwey Score
Fetal Anemia
FGR Criteria
FSFI
Have feedback about this calculator?Let us know.