Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

Quick Access

Favorites
Most Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
Clinical CalculatorsDrugsGuidelines
SpecsDrugsGuides
ABC-AF Bleeding ScoreABC-AF Stroke ScoreABCD2 ScoreADD-RSAortic Valve Calcium ScoreAPPLE ScoreASCVD (Pooled Cohort)AVA (Continuity Equation)BAG-AHF ScoreBiplane Simpson EFBlood Pressure PercentilesBrugada Criteria (VT vs SVT)Cardiac Output IndexCHA2DS2-VAScCHADS2Cornell Voltage CriteriaCRUSADE Bleeding ScoreDAPT ScoreDASIDuke Treadmill ScoreE/A RatioEDACS ScoreEHMRGEHRA ScoreEmbolic Risk ScoreEROA (PISA Method)FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve)Fick Cardiac OutputFramingham 10-Year RiskFriedewald LDL EquationGorlin EquationGRACE ScoreGupta MICA (NSQIP)GWTG-HF ScoreH2FPEF ScoreHakki FormulaHAS-BLEDHEART PathwayHEART ScoreHEMORR2HAGEShs-Troponin 0h/1h ESC AlgorithmiFRINTERCHEST ScoreKillip ClassificationLee's RCRILV Mass IndexLV Stroke Work IndexMAGGIC Risk ScoreMAP CalculatorMartin/Hopkins LDLModified Duke CriteriaModified Sgarbossa CriteriaMVA (Pressure Half-Time)Non-HDL CholesterolNT-proBNP Age-Adjusted ThresholdsORBIT ScoreOttawa Heart Failure RiskPREVENT EquationsPulse PressurePVR CalculatorPVR IndexQRISK3QTc (Bazett)QTc (Fridericia)REVEAL 2.0 ScoreREVEAL Lite 2Reynolds Risk ScoreROSIRVSP CalculatorSchwartz Score (LQTS)SCORE2Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)Sgarbossa CriteriaShock IndexSokolow-Lyon VoltageStroke Volume IndexSVR CalculatorSYNTAX ScoreSYNTAX Score IITAPSETeichholz FormulaTIMI (STEMI)TIMI (UA/NSTEMI)Troponin Delta CalculatorValvular GradientsVancouver Chest Pain RuleVereckei AlgorithmWATCHDM ScoreWilkins ScoreWood Units Calculator
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2026

•

All Rights Reserved

QTc (Bazett)

Bazett Correction Standard • Accurate at HR 60-100 bpm

ms

Measure from start of Q wave to end of T wave.

bpm

Standard heart rate from ECG or pulse.

Ready for calculation

Enter QT and Heart Rate to view arrhythmia risk.

Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

When to Use

Clinical Applications

Identification of drug-induced QT prolongation (e.g., Macrolides, Antipsychotics).
Screening for Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS).
Pre-operative ECG clearance for patients on high-risk medications.
Monitoring electrolyte disturbances (Hypokalemia, Hypomagnesemia, Hypocalcemia).

Why Correction Matters

The absolute QT interval varies inversely with heart rate. A raw QT of 400ms might be normal at 60 bpm but dangerously prolonged at 100 bpm. Correction (QTc) allows for a standardized assessment across different heart rates.

How it Works

Mathematical Formula

QTc = QT / √(RR) Where RR is in seconds (60 / Heart Rate).

Diagnostic Thresholds

Normal (Males)≤ 440 ms
Normal (Females)≤ 460 ms
Borderline (Males)441 – 470 ms
Borderline (Females)461 – 480 ms
Prolonged (High Risk)> 500 ms (Strong TdP risk)

Clinical Pearls

The "Bazett Limitation"

Bazett is known to over-correct at HR > 100 bpm (leading to false positives for LQTS) and under-correct at HR < 60 bpm. For tachycardic patients, Fridericia or Framingham formulas are evidence-based alternatives.

Measurement Pearls

Measure in Lead II or V5-V6 where the end of the T-wave is most distinct.
Use the "Tangent Method" (Maximum Slope Method) if the T-wave end is ambiguous.
Exclude U-waves from the measurement unless they are merged with the T-wave.

Next Steps

Management of QTc > 500ms

01
Discontinue non-essential QT-prolonging medications.
02
Aggressively replate electrolytes (target K+ > 4.0, Mg2+ > 2.0).
03
Perform a repeat ECG to confirm measurement accuracy.
04
Evaluate for underlying bradycardia or heart block.

Alternative Formulas

Fridericia’s Formula (Preferred for Tachycardia)
Framingham Formula (Linear correction)
Hodges Formula
HAS-BLED (Bleeding risk)

The Evidence

Primary Derivation

An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms.

Bazett HC. • Heart.. 1920;One of the first and most enduring formulas in cardiology.

Origins & History

A Century of Correction

In 1920, British physiologist Henry Cuthbert Bazett published his study "An analysis of the time-relations of electrocardiograms." Working in an era before automated ECG interpretation, Bazett sought a simple mathematical way to adjust the QT interval for varying heart rates. Despite modern evidence showing it is less accurate than newer linear models, his square-root formula remains the most widely used and recognized QTc method in clinical practice worldwide.

Henry Cuthbert Bazett (1885–1950)

A pioneer in applied physiology, Bazett was a leader in temperature regulation and aviation medicine. He was known for performing physiological experiments on himself to understand human blood flow and heat loss. His formula for the corrected QT was a side project in his broader study of cardiovascular timing.

Historical Timeline

01
1920 — Henry Bazett publishes the square-root formula.
02
1948 — Fridericia proposes the cube-root formula to fix Bazett’s tachycardic errors.
03
1960s — Bazett’s formula is hardcoded into automated ECG machines.
04
2005 — FDA mandates "Thorough QT" studies for all new drugs.
05
Present — Guidelines maintain Bazett as a common clinical reference despite known flaws.

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17

In Recent Clinical News

Scanning Medical Journals

No new significant updates or guidelines matching this topic were found today. We will check again soon.