Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

Quick Access

Favorites
Most Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
Clinical CalculatorsDrugsGuidelines
SpecsDrugsGuides
ABC-AF Bleeding ScoreABC-AF Stroke ScoreABCD2 ScoreADD-RSAortic Valve Calcium ScoreAPPLE ScoreASCVD (Pooled Cohort)AVA (Continuity Equation)BAG-AHF ScoreBiplane Simpson EFBlood Pressure PercentilesBrugada Criteria (VT vs SVT)Cardiac Output IndexCHA2DS2-VAScCHADS2Cornell Voltage CriteriaCRUSADE Bleeding ScoreDAPT ScoreDASIDuke Treadmill ScoreE/A RatioEDACS ScoreEHMRGEHRA ScoreEmbolic Risk ScoreEROA (PISA Method)FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve)Fick Cardiac OutputFramingham 10-Year RiskFriedewald LDL EquationGorlin EquationGRACE ScoreGupta MICA (NSQIP)GWTG-HF ScoreH2FPEF ScoreHakki FormulaHAS-BLEDHEART PathwayHEART ScoreHEMORR2HAGEShs-Troponin 0h/1h ESC AlgorithmiFRINTERCHEST ScoreKillip ClassificationLee's RCRILV Mass IndexLV Stroke Work IndexMAGGIC Risk ScoreMAP CalculatorMartin/Hopkins LDLModified Duke CriteriaModified Sgarbossa CriteriaMVA (Pressure Half-Time)Non-HDL CholesterolNT-proBNP Age-Adjusted ThresholdsORBIT ScoreOttawa Heart Failure RiskPREVENT EquationsPulse PressurePVR CalculatorPVR IndexQRISK3QTc (Bazett)QTc (Fridericia)REVEAL 2.0 ScoreREVEAL Lite 2Reynolds Risk ScoreROSIRVSP CalculatorSchwartz Score (LQTS)SCORE2Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)Sgarbossa CriteriaShock IndexSokolow-Lyon VoltageStroke Volume IndexSVR CalculatorSYNTAX ScoreSYNTAX Score IITAPSETeichholz FormulaTIMI (STEMI)TIMI (UA/NSTEMI)Troponin Delta CalculatorValvular GradientsVancouver Chest Pain RuleVereckei AlgorithmWATCHDM ScoreWilkins ScoreWood Units Calculator
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2026

•

All Rights Reserved

HEART Score

Validated for ED chest pain triage

Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

When to Use

When to Use

Risk stratification of patients ≥18 years presenting to the Emergency Department with chest pain.
Assessing the probability of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) within 6 weeks.
Identifying low-risk patients suitable for early discharge without bedside observation or immediate provocative testing.

When NOT to Use

New ST-segment elevation (STEMI): These patients require immediate reperfusion.
Hemodynamic instability or obvious alternative life-threatening diagnosis (e.g., tension pneumothorax).
Patients with new, clearly ischemic ECG changes (ST-depression ≥1mm).

How it Works

Scoring Components

H — HistoryHighly Suspicious (2), Moderately (1), Slightly (0)
E — ECGST-depression (2), Non-specific (1), Normal (0)
A — Age≥65 (2), 45-64 (1), <45 (0)
R — Risk Factors≥3 (2), 1-2 (1), 0 (0)
T — Troponin≥3x Limit (2), 1-3x Limit (1), ≤Limit (0)

Interpretation & MACE Risk

Score 0–3Low Risk (0.9–1.7% MACE)
Score 4–6Intermediate Risk (12–16.6% MACE)
Score 7–10High Risk (50–65% MACE)

Clinical Pearls

The "History" Variable

History is the most subjective component but also one of the most predictive. "Highly suspicious" generally includes retrosternal pressure, radiation to arms/jaw, and diaphoresis. A score of "0" requires a non-ischemic explanation for the pain.

HEART vs. TIMI & GRACE

HEART was designed specifically for the undifferentiated ED chest pain population.
TIMI and GRACE were derived from patients already diagnosed with ACS, making them better for prognosis but less ideal for "rule-out" triage.
The HEART score is widely considered the superior rule-out tool in modern emergency medicine.

Next Steps

Management Recommendations

01
Score 0–3: Consider immediate discharge. Recent evidence suggests MACE risk is low enough for outpatient follow-up.
02
Score 4–6: Admission for observation, serial troponins, and potentially non-invasive testing (Stress test, CCTA).
03
Score 7–10: High probability of ACS. Early invasive strategy (Catheterization) often indicated.

Complementary Tools

HEART Pathway
TIMI (UA/NSTEMI)
GRACE Score
EDACS Score
Vancouver Chest Pain Rule

The Evidence

Primary Derivation

Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.

Six AJ et al. • Neth Heart J.. 2008;n=122. Initial study showing that no patients with low HEART scores had a MACE.

Large Scale Validation

A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department.

Backus BE et al. • Int J Cardiol.. 2013;n=2,388. Confirmed the low MACE rate in those with scores <4.

Origins & History

Development Team

Created by Dr. Jacobus Six and colleagues in the Netherlands. It was designed to provide a simple, easy-to-remember mnemonic that combined clinical judgment with objective lab and ECG data.

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17

Recent Journal Updates

JAMAJul 21, 2026
Correction to Primary Composite Outcome in a Trial of Transfusion Strategy

Clinical Context

We think this might be relevant to the clinical guidance for HEART Score — Chest Pain Risk Stratification.

Cancer MedicineJul 16, 2026
Notch3/4 Knockdown Inhibits Colon Adenocarcinoma Progression by Suppressing Tumor Cell Activity and Orchestrating VEGFA‐Dependent Tumor Immune Microenvironment

Clinical Context

We think this might be relevant to the clinical guidance for HEART Score — Chest Pain Risk Stratification.

FDA MedWatchJul 2, 2026
Heart Pump Recall: Abiomed Removes Impella CP Sets with SmartAssist

Clinical Context

We think this might be relevant to the clinical guidance for HEART Score — Chest Pain Risk Stratification.