Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used
FavesSpecsDrugsGuidesTop
ABC-AF Bleeding ScoreABC-AF Stroke ScoreABCD2 ScoreADD-RSAortic Valve Calcium ScoreAPPLE ScoreASCVD (Pooled Cohort)AVA (Continuity Equation)BAG-AHF ScoreBiplane Simpson EFBlood Pressure PercentilesBrugada Criteria (VT vs SVT)Cardiac Output IndexCHA2DS2-VAScCHADS2Cornell Voltage CriteriaCRUSADE Bleeding ScoreDAPT ScoreDASIDuke Treadmill ScoreE/A RatioEDACS ScoreEHMRGEHRA ScoreEmbolic Risk ScoreEROA (PISA Method)FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve)Fick Cardiac OutputFramingham 10-Year RiskFriedewald LDL EquationGorlin EquationGRACE ScoreGupta MICA (NSQIP)GWTG-HF ScoreH2FPEF ScoreHakki FormulaHAS-BLEDHEART PathwayHEART ScoreHEMORR2HAGEShs-Troponin 0h/1h ESC AlgorithmiFRINTERCHEST ScoreKillip ClassificationLee's RCRILV Mass IndexLV Stroke Work IndexMAGGIC Risk ScoreMAP CalculatorMartin/Hopkins LDLModified Duke CriteriaModified Sgarbossa CriteriaMVA (Pressure Half-Time)Non-HDL CholesterolNT-proBNP Age-Adjusted ThresholdsORBIT ScoreOttawa Heart Failure RiskPREVENT EquationsPulse PressurePVR CalculatorPVR IndexQRISK3QTc (Bazett)QTc (Fridericia)REVEAL 2.0 ScoreREVEAL Lite 2Reynolds Risk ScoreROSIRVSP CalculatorSchwartz Score (LQTS)SCORE2Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)Sgarbossa CriteriaShock IndexSokolow-Lyon VoltageStroke Volume IndexSVR CalculatorSYNTAX ScoreSYNTAX Score IITAPSETeichholz FormulaTIMI (STEMI)TIMI (UA/NSTEMI)Troponin Delta CalculatorValvular GradientsVancouver Chest Pain RuleVereckei AlgorithmWATCHDM ScoreWilkins ScoreWood Units Calculator
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2018-2026

•

All Rights Reserved

In Recent Clinical News

Scanning Medical Journals

No new significant updates or guidelines matching this topic were found today. We will check again soon.

Brugada Criteria (VT vs SVT)

Brugada Algorithm

Circulation 1991: Stepwise Diagnosis of WCT

Criterion 1 of 4

Absence of an RS complex in all precordial leads?

Examine V1–V6. If there are ONLY monophasic R, QS, or QR waves (positive or negative concordance), the diagnosis is VT.

Diagnostic Tips

Step 1 definition: Complexes like QR, QS, or monophasic R are not considered RS complexes.

Step 2 (RS > 100ms): Measure from the R deflection start to the S-wave nadir. 100ms = 2.5 small boxes.

Clinical Warning

Treatment for Wide Complex Tachycardia should prioritize ACLS protocols. In hemodynamically unstable patients, synchronize cardioversion immediately.

Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026

When to Use

When to Use the Brugada Algorithm

Primary Indication: Patients presenting with a regular wide-complex tachycardia (WCT) on 12-lead ECG with QRS duration ≥120 ms (0.12 seconds)
Differentiation Goal: Distinguish Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) from Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) with aberrant conduction (bundle branch block)
Clinical Context: Hemodynamically stable patients where a 12-lead ECG can be obtained before treatment
Epidemiologic Rationale: 80% of all wide-complex tachycardias are VT; in patients >50 years or with structural heart disease, >90% are VT
Secondary Use: Differential diagnosis of wide-complex tachycardia in emergency departments, intensive care units, and cardiology consultations

Do NOT Use If (Absolute Contraindication)

Patient is hemodynamically unstable. In the setting of instability (hypotension with systolic BP <90 mmHg, altered mental status, ischemic chest pain, acute heart failure, pulmonary edema, or cardiogenic shock), immediately proceed to synchronized DC cardioversion regardless of the rhythm mechanism. Do NOT delay treatment to apply diagnostic algorithms.

The Three Main Causes of Wide-Complex Tachycardia

CauseFrequencyElectrophysiologic MechanismECG Clues
Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)80% (90% if age >50 or structural disease)Re-entry, automaticity, or triggered activity originating in ventricular myocardium (outside His-Purkinje system). Cell-to-cell conduction is slow (myocyte-to-myocyte).AV dissociation, fusion/capture beats, extreme axis deviation, very wide QRS (>160 ms), precordial concordance, Brugada criteria positive.
SVT with Aberrant Conduction15%SVT (AVNRT, AVRT, atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter) conducted to ventricles with rate-related bundle branch block (phase 3 block) or pre-existing BBB.Typical RBBB or LBBB morphology, normal axis (except in RBBB where right axis is possible), RS interval <100 ms, Brugada criteria negative.
SVT with Accessory Pathway (Antidromic AVRT)3-5% (WPW syndrome)SVT where impulse travels anterograde down accessory pathway and retrograde up AV node. Entire ventricular activation is via accessory pathway (preexcited).Very wide QRS (>140 ms), delta wave visible (compare to sinus), mimics VT. Brugada algorithm often MISCLASSIFIES antidromic AVRT as VT (false positive). Rare, but consider in young patients with known WPW.

Clinical Warning: The 80/95 Rule

STATISTICAL REALITY: 80% of all wide-complex tachycardias are VT. In patients over 50 years of age or with known structural heart disease (prior MI, cardiomyopathy, heart failure), that figure exceeds 95%. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: When in doubt about the Brugada algorithm results, ALWAYS default to treating the rhythm as VT. Misdiagnosing VT as SVT can lead to administration of AV nodal blocking agents (adenosine, verapamil, diltiazem, beta-blockers) which are contraindicated in VT (may cause hemodynamic collapse, degeneration to VF, or death). The safer diagnostic error is to treat SVT as VT (with synchronized cardioversion or procainamide) rather than VT as SVT.

Related Scores in Practice

In clinical practice, this assessment is frequently evaluated alongside other validated measures. Depending on the patient's presentation and specific diagnostic requirements, you may also need to utilize the Vereckei Algorithm, Sokolow-Lyon Voltage, Cornell Voltage Criteria or the Shock Index to formulate a comprehensive care plan.

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026

Related Cardiovascular Tools

WATCHDM Score
Embolic Risk Score
Shock Index
EROA
PVR Index
ASCVD
CRUSADE Bleeding Score
SVR Calculator
BAG-AHF Score
Killip Classification
Cardiovascular CalculatorsCritical Care CalculatorsEmergency Medicine Calculators
Have feedback about this calculator?Let us know.