Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

Quick Access

Favorites
Most Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
Clinical CalculatorsDrugsGuidelines
SpecsDrugsGuides
ABC-AF Bleeding ScoreABC-AF Stroke ScoreABCD2 ScoreADD-RSAortic Valve Calcium ScoreAPPLE ScoreASCVD (Pooled Cohort)AVA (Continuity Equation)BAG-AHF ScoreBiplane Simpson EFBlood Pressure PercentilesBrugada Criteria (VT vs SVT)Cardiac Output IndexCHA2DS2-VAScCHADS2Cornell Voltage CriteriaCRUSADE Bleeding ScoreDAPT ScoreDASIDuke Treadmill ScoreE/A RatioEDACS ScoreEHMRGEHRA ScoreEmbolic Risk ScoreEROA (PISA Method)FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve)Fick Cardiac OutputFramingham 10-Year RiskFriedewald LDL EquationGorlin EquationGRACE ScoreGupta MICA (NSQIP)GWTG-HF ScoreH2FPEF ScoreHakki FormulaHAS-BLEDHEART PathwayHEART ScoreHEMORR2HAGEShs-Troponin 0h/1h ESC AlgorithmiFRINTERCHEST ScoreKillip ClassificationLee's RCRILV Mass IndexLV Stroke Work IndexMAGGIC Risk ScoreMAP CalculatorMartin/Hopkins LDLModified Duke CriteriaModified Sgarbossa CriteriaMVA (Pressure Half-Time)Non-HDL CholesterolNT-proBNP Age-Adjusted ThresholdsORBIT ScoreOttawa Heart Failure RiskPREVENT EquationsPulse PressurePVR CalculatorPVR IndexQRISK3QTc (Bazett)QTc (Fridericia)REVEAL 2.0 ScoreREVEAL Lite 2Reynolds Risk ScoreROSIRVSP CalculatorSchwartz Score (LQTS)SCORE2Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)Sgarbossa CriteriaShock IndexSokolow-Lyon VoltageStroke Volume IndexSVR CalculatorSYNTAX ScoreSYNTAX Score IITAPSETeichholz FormulaTIMI (STEMI)TIMI (UA/NSTEMI)Troponin Delta CalculatorValvular GradientsVancouver Chest Pain RuleVereckei AlgorithmWATCHDM ScoreWilkins ScoreWood Units Calculator
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2026

•

All Rights Reserved

MVA (Pressure Half-Time)

MVA (Pressure Half-Time): Estimates Mitral Valve Area from the deceleration of mitral inflow. Standard method for grading Mitral Stenosis.

Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

When to Use

When to Use

Evaluation and grading of Mitral Stenosis (MS) severity during transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE).
To monitor progression of native valve or bioprosthetic mitral stenosis.

Do Not Rely on if

Patient has severe Aortic Regurgitation, reduced LV compliance, or if assessed immediately following mitral valvuloplasty. These conditions alter the transmitral pressure gradient independent of the valve area.

How it Works

Electrophysiological and Physical Basis

The Pressure Half-Time (PHT) is the time required for the peak transmitral pressure gradient to decline to one-half of its original value. In mitral stenosis, the time it takes for the pressure in the left atrium to equilize with the left ventricle is prolonged because the stenotic valve orifice restricts flow.

The 220 Constant

Empirically, a PHT of 220 ms has been found to correspond to a Mitral Valve Area (MVA) of 1.0 cm2. Thus, MVA = 220 / PHT.

Severity Grading (ASE)

01
Mild MS: MVA > 1.5 cm2 (PHT < 150 ms)
02
Moderate MS: MVA 1.0–1.5 cm2 (PHT 150–220 ms)
03
Severe MS: MVA < 1.0 cm2 (PHT > 220 ms)

Clinical Pearls

Confounding Factors

If left ventricular compliance is reduced (e.g., in elderly patients with LVH/HTN), the PHT will be shortened, falsely underestimating the severity of MS. Conversely, if LA compliance is increased, the PHT will be lengthened.

Gold Standard

Planimetry of the mitral valve in the short-axis view remains the anatomical gold standard for MVA, but can be technically difficult and requires excellent image quality.

The Evidence

Refining the Measurement

Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound.

Hatle L et al. • Circulation.. 1979;60(5):1096-104. The original paper that popularized the PHT method.

Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.

Baumgartner H et al. • J Am Soc Echocardiogr.. 2009;22(1):1-23. Established the modern thresholds for severity.

Next Steps

Complementary Calculators

AVA (Continuity Equation)
EROA (PISA Method)
Biplane Simpson EF
TAPSE (RV Systolic Function)
RVSP Calculator

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17

Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

When to Use

When to Use

Evaluation and grading of Mitral Stenosis (MS) severity during transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography (TTE/TEE).
To monitor progression of native valve or bioprosthetic mitral stenosis.

Do Not Rely on if

Patient has severe Aortic Regurgitation, reduced LV compliance, or if assessed immediately following mitral valvuloplasty. These conditions alter the transmitral pressure gradient independent of the valve area.

How it Works

Electrophysiological and Physical Basis

The Pressure Half-Time (PHT) is the time required for the peak transmitral pressure gradient to decline to one-half of its original value. In mitral stenosis, the time it takes for the pressure in the left atrium to equilize with the left ventricle is prolonged because the stenotic valve orifice restricts flow.

The 220 Constant

Empirically, a PHT of 220 ms has been found to correspond to a Mitral Valve Area (MVA) of 1.0 cm2. Thus, MVA = 220 / PHT.

Severity Grading (ASE)

01
Mild MS: MVA > 1.5 cm2 (PHT < 150 ms)
02
Moderate MS: MVA 1.0–1.5 cm2 (PHT 150–220 ms)
03
Severe MS: MVA < 1.0 cm2 (PHT > 220 ms)

Clinical Pearls

Confounding Factors

If left ventricular compliance is reduced (e.g., in elderly patients with LVH/HTN), the PHT will be shortened, falsely underestimating the severity of MS. Conversely, if LA compliance is increased, the PHT will be lengthened.

Gold Standard

Planimetry of the mitral valve in the short-axis view remains the anatomical gold standard for MVA, but can be technically difficult and requires excellent image quality.

The Evidence

Refining the Measurement

Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound.

Hatle L et al. • Circulation.. 1979;60(5):1096-104. The original paper that popularized the PHT method.

Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice.

Baumgartner H et al. • J Am Soc Echocardiogr.. 2009;22(1):1-23. Established the modern thresholds for severity.

Next Steps

Complementary Calculators

AVA (Continuity Equation)
EROA (PISA Method)
Biplane Simpson EF
TAPSE (RV Systolic Function)
RVSP Calculator

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17

Recent Journal Updates

WHO NewsJul 20, 2026
Road deaths fall by 21% globally but stronger action is needed to save lives

Clinical Context

We think this might be relevant to the clinical guidance for MVA (Pressure Half-Time).

WHO NewsJul 15, 2026
New WHO guidelines: up to 45% of dementia risk could be prevented or delayed

Clinical Context

We think this might be relevant to the clinical guidance for MVA (Pressure Half-Time).

FDA MedWatchJul 14, 2026
Positive Pressure Breathing Device Correction: Baxter Issues Correction for Volera Positive Pressure Breathing Devices

Clinical Context

We think this might be relevant to the clinical guidance for MVA (Pressure Half-Time).