Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

Quick Access

Favorites
Most Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
Clinical CalculatorsDrugsGuidelines
SpecsDrugsGuides
ABC-AF Bleeding ScoreABC-AF Stroke ScoreABCD2 ScoreADD-RSAortic Valve Calcium ScoreAPPLE ScoreASCVD (Pooled Cohort)AVA (Continuity Equation)BAG-AHF ScoreBiplane Simpson EFBlood Pressure PercentilesBrugada Criteria (VT vs SVT)Cardiac Output IndexCHA2DS2-VAScCHADS2Cornell Voltage CriteriaCRUSADE Bleeding ScoreDAPT ScoreDASIDuke Treadmill ScoreE/A RatioEDACS ScoreEHMRGEHRA ScoreEmbolic Risk ScoreEROA (PISA Method)FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve)Fick Cardiac OutputFramingham 10-Year RiskFriedewald LDL EquationGorlin EquationGRACE ScoreGupta MICA (NSQIP)GWTG-HF ScoreH2FPEF ScoreHakki FormulaHAS-BLEDHEART PathwayHEART ScoreHEMORR2HAGEShs-Troponin 0h/1h ESC AlgorithmiFRINTERCHEST ScoreKillip ClassificationLee's RCRILV Mass IndexLV Stroke Work IndexMAGGIC Risk ScoreMAP CalculatorMartin/Hopkins LDLModified Duke CriteriaModified Sgarbossa CriteriaMVA (Pressure Half-Time)Non-HDL CholesterolNT-proBNP Age-Adjusted ThresholdsORBIT ScoreOttawa Heart Failure RiskPREVENT EquationsPulse PressurePVR CalculatorPVR IndexQRISK3QTc (Bazett)QTc (Fridericia)REVEAL 2.0 ScoreREVEAL Lite 2Reynolds Risk ScoreROSIRVSP CalculatorSchwartz Score (LQTS)SCORE2Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM)Sgarbossa CriteriaShock IndexSokolow-Lyon VoltageStroke Volume IndexSVR CalculatorSYNTAX ScoreSYNTAX Score IITAPSETeichholz FormulaTIMI (STEMI)TIMI (UA/NSTEMI)Troponin Delta CalculatorValvular GradientsVancouver Chest Pain RuleVereckei AlgorithmWATCHDM ScoreWilkins ScoreWood Units Calculator
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2026

•

All Rights Reserved

EDACS Score

EDACS Score: Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score. Identifies patients safe for 2-hour early discharge.

45 years
Sex
Age 18-50 AND (known CAD or ≥3 risk factors)
Diaphoresis
Pain radiates to arm, shoulder, neck, or jaw
Pain worsened by inspiration (-4 pts)
Pain reproduced by palpation (-6 pts)
Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

When to Use

When to Use

Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
Used to identify a cohort of patients at sufficiently low risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) to be safely discharged at 2 hours

Do Not Use If

Patient has unequivocal ongoing ischemia, dynamic ECG changes, hemodynamic instability, or another emergent cause for chest pain (e.g., aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism).

How it Works

Scoring Logic

The EDACS (Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score) incorporates age, sex, risk factors, and classical symptom presentation to calculate risk. Notably, elements that make ACS *less* likely (pain with inspiration, pain on palpation) subtract points.

Integrating with Troponin

01
1. Calculate the EDACS score. A score < 16 identifies the patient as "Low Risk".
02
2. Obtain an ECG. It must show NO new ischemia.
03
3. Obtain a high-sensitivity troponin at 0-hour and 2-hours. Both must be normal/negative according to local assay thresholds.
04
4. If all three criteria (EDACS < 16, normal ECG, negative 0h/2h trops) are met, the patient is safe for early discharge.

Clinical Pearls

EDACS vs HEART Score

While the HEART score uses the physician's subjective assessment of the chest pain history ("highly suspicious", "moderately suspicious"), EDACS relies on explicitly defined symptoms (diaphoresis, radiation). This makes EDACS more objective and potentially more reproducible, particularly for less experienced clinicians.

Efficiency

Studies comparing EDACS to the ADAPT protocol (incorporating TIMI) and HEART pathway have consistently shown that EDACS identifies a higher proportion of patients (up to 40-50%) as safe for early discharge without missing additional MACE.

The Evidence

Original Derivation

Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol.

Than M et al. • Emerg Med Australas.. 2014;26(1):34-44. Derived in 1974 patients and validated in a separate cohort. Demonstrated 100% sensitivity for MACE when combined with 0/2h troponins and ECG.

Large-scale Validation

Performance of the EDACS-ADP in a Large Community-based Cohort.

Mark DG et al. • Ann Emerg Med.. 2018;71(5):609-618. Retrospective validation in over 118,000 patients across Kaiser Permanente. Replicated the high sensitivity (>99%) and high proportion of patients identified for early discharge.

Next Steps

Complementary Calculators

HEART Score
HEART Pathway
TIMI Risk Score for UA/NSTEMI
Vancouver Chest Pain Rule

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17

Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

When to Use

When to Use

Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
Used to identify a cohort of patients at sufficiently low risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) to be safely discharged at 2 hours

Do Not Use If

Patient has unequivocal ongoing ischemia, dynamic ECG changes, hemodynamic instability, or another emergent cause for chest pain (e.g., aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism).

How it Works

Scoring Logic

The EDACS (Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score) incorporates age, sex, risk factors, and classical symptom presentation to calculate risk. Notably, elements that make ACS *less* likely (pain with inspiration, pain on palpation) subtract points.

Integrating with Troponin

01
1. Calculate the EDACS score. A score < 16 identifies the patient as "Low Risk".
02
2. Obtain an ECG. It must show NO new ischemia.
03
3. Obtain a high-sensitivity troponin at 0-hour and 2-hours. Both must be normal/negative according to local assay thresholds.
04
4. If all three criteria (EDACS < 16, normal ECG, negative 0h/2h trops) are met, the patient is safe for early discharge.

Clinical Pearls

EDACS vs HEART Score

While the HEART score uses the physician's subjective assessment of the chest pain history ("highly suspicious", "moderately suspicious"), EDACS relies on explicitly defined symptoms (diaphoresis, radiation). This makes EDACS more objective and potentially more reproducible, particularly for less experienced clinicians.

Efficiency

Studies comparing EDACS to the ADAPT protocol (incorporating TIMI) and HEART pathway have consistently shown that EDACS identifies a higher proportion of patients (up to 40-50%) as safe for early discharge without missing additional MACE.

The Evidence

Original Derivation

Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol.

Than M et al. • Emerg Med Australas.. 2014;26(1):34-44. Derived in 1974 patients and validated in a separate cohort. Demonstrated 100% sensitivity for MACE when combined with 0/2h troponins and ECG.

Large-scale Validation

Performance of the EDACS-ADP in a Large Community-based Cohort.

Mark DG et al. • Ann Emerg Med.. 2018;71(5):609-618. Retrospective validation in over 118,000 patients across Kaiser Permanente. Replicated the high sensitivity (>99%) and high proportion of patients identified for early discharge.

Next Steps

Complementary Calculators

HEART Score
HEART Pathway
TIMI Risk Score for UA/NSTEMI
Vancouver Chest Pain Rule

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17

Recent Journal Updates

JAMAJul 21, 2026
Accrediting Bodies to Increase Nutrition Education Requirements

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to EDACS Score.

JAMAJul 21, 2026
Are Psychiatric Medications Really Overprescribed?

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to EDACS Score.

JAMAJul 21, 2026
Correction to Primary Composite Outcome in a Trial of Transfusion Strategy

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to EDACS Score.