Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

Quick Access

Favorites
Most Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
Clinical CalculatorsDrugsGuidelines
SpecsDrugsGuides
ALBI Grade (Liver)ASTCT GradingATA Thyroid RiskBCLC 2022 Staging (HCC)BSA (Mosteller)CLL-IPICML ELTS ScoreCNS-IPICTCAE v5.0Calvert FormulaDIPSS-Plus (Myelofibrosis)Deauville ScoreEAU NMIBC RiskECOG Performance StatusELN 2022 Risk (AML)ELN CML MilestonesFIGO 2021 (Ovarian)FIGO 2023 (Endometrial)FLIPI-2Fleischner 2017 GuidelinesFong Clinical Risk ScoreHCT-CI (Sorror Score)HPV/p16 OropharynxIGCCCG Risk (Testicular)IMDC (Heng) CriteriaIMWG Myeloma FrailtyIPSS-M (Molecular MDS)ISUP Grade GroupsKarnofsky Status (KPS)Khorana ScoreLugano ClassificationLung-RADS v2022MIPI-b (Biological)MRD Assessment FrameworkMSI/MMR InterpretationMayo 20/2/20 (SMM)NCCN Prostate RiskNCCN-IPI (DLBCL)NSCLC GPAOncotype DX RecurrenceOpioid EquianalgesicPD-L1 TPS InterpretationPERCIST 2.0PREDICT v3.0Platinum-Free IntervalR2-ISS (Revised 2)RANO 2.0RCB (Residual Cancer Burden)RECIST 1.1ROMA ScoreSAVER ScoreSINS ScoreSLiM-CRAB CriteriaSedlis/Peters CriteriaTNM 8th (Colorectal)TNM 8th Ed (Prognostic)TNM 9th (Nasopharynx)TNM 9th Ed (NSCLC)TNM 9th Ed (SCLC)Tyrer-Cuzick (IBIS v8)WHO 2021 CNS Class.WHO 2022 / ICC 2022 AMLZ0011 EligibilityiRECISTiwCLL 2018 ResponsemRECIST (HCC)mRENAL ScoremrTRG (Rectal MRI)
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2026

•

All Rights Reserved

Karnofsky Status (KPS)

KPSKarnofsky Performance Status

Select Performance Level

Functional Score

100%

Definition

Able to carry on normal activity and to work; no special care needed.

Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026-07-17

How it Works

Functional Decile Mapping

Score (%)Level of Functional Capacity
100No complaints; no evidence of disease.
90Able to carry on normal activity; minor signs or symptoms.
80Normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms.
70Cares for self; unable to carry on normal activity or active work.
60Requires occasional assistance; able to care for most personal needs.
50Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care.
40Disabled; requires special care and assistance.
30Severely disabled; hospital admission indicated.
20Very sick; hospital admission necessary; active supportive treatment.
10Moribund; fatal processes progressing rapidly.
0Dead.

Clinical Pearls

Statistical Reliability

Strong positive correlation with Katz ADL ($r = 0.895$) and negative correlation with IADL ($r = -0.894$).
Internal reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) calculated at 0.720 in palliative settings (Yıldız Çeltek, 2019).
Independent validation in Turkish cohorts verified KPS as highly reliable for outpatient and palliative care evaluation.

The Evidence

Validation Studies

Karnofsky Performance Scale validity and reliability of Turkish palliative cancer patients.

Yıldız Çeltek N et al. • Turk J Med Sci. 2019;

View Source

NIH Systematic Review

Appendix 6: Karnofsky performance status and WHO performance status scores.

HTA Systematic Review • NIH Bookshelf. 2011;

View Source

Origins & History

Institutional Resources

Compassus Clinical Scoring Guide

Creator Attribution

The scale was originally defined by Dr. Joseph H. Burchenal and Dr. David A. Karnofsky in 1949 and has since become a global standard for clinical oncology and palliative medicine.

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026-07-17

In Recent Clinical News

Scanning Medical Journals

No new significant updates or guidelines matching this topic were found today. We will check again soon.