Logo

OpiCalc

FavoritesSpecialtiesDrugsGuidelinesMost Used

Quick Access

Favorites
Most Used

All Specialties

OpiCalc Logo
Clinical CalculatorsDrugsGuidelines
SpecsDrugsGuides
ALBI Grade (Liver)ASTCT GradingATA Thyroid RiskBCLC 2022 Staging (HCC)BSA (Mosteller)CLL-IPICML ELTS ScoreCNS-IPICTCAE v5.0Calvert FormulaDIPSS-Plus (Myelofibrosis)Deauville ScoreEAU NMIBC RiskECOG Performance StatusELN 2022 Risk (AML)ELN CML MilestonesFIGO 2021 (Ovarian)FIGO 2023 (Endometrial)FLIPI-2Fleischner 2017 GuidelinesFong Clinical Risk ScoreHCT-CI (Sorror Score)HPV/p16 OropharynxIGCCCG Risk (Testicular)IMDC (Heng) CriteriaIMWG Myeloma FrailtyIPSS-M (Molecular MDS)ISUP Grade GroupsKarnofsky Status (KPS)Khorana ScoreLugano ClassificationLung-RADS v2022MIPI-b (Biological)MRD Assessment FrameworkMSI/MMR InterpretationMayo 20/2/20 (SMM)NCCN Prostate RiskNCCN-IPI (DLBCL)NSCLC GPAOncotype DX RecurrenceOpioid EquianalgesicPD-L1 TPS InterpretationPERCIST 2.0PREDICT v3.0Platinum-Free IntervalR2-ISS (Revised 2)RANO 2.0RCB (Residual Cancer Burden)RECIST 1.1ROMA ScoreSAVER ScoreSINS ScoreSLiM-CRAB CriteriaSedlis/Peters CriteriaTNM 8th (Colorectal)TNM 8th Ed (Prognostic)TNM 9th (Nasopharynx)TNM 9th Ed (NSCLC)TNM 9th Ed (SCLC)Tyrer-Cuzick (IBIS v8)WHO 2021 CNS Class.WHO 2022 / ICC 2022 AMLZ0011 EligibilityiRECISTiwCLL 2018 ResponsemRECIST (HCC)mRENAL ScoremrTRG (Rectal MRI)
OpiCalc Logo

OpiCalc

Easy, fast, and private medical tools for clinicians. Always free.

No Login Required
Ready for the Bedside

Resources

About UsEditorial PolicyMedical DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms of UseCookie Policy

Support

Contact Us

Clinical Notice:OpiCalc is not a substitute for professional clinical judgment. Always verify dosages and guidelines.

OpiCalc © 2026

•

All Rights Reserved

RANO 2.0

RANO 2.0Glioma Response Framework

Radiographic Category

Clinical pearl

RANO 2.0 unifies the criteria for high-grade and low-grade gliomas. It emphasizes that Clinical Deterioration attributable to the tumor is sufficient to define PD, even if scans are stable.

Response Outlook

SD

Clinical Strategy

Stable Disease. Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR/MR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD.

Guidelines & Evidence

Verified

Last Review: 2026

When to Use

Clinical Use

Used for all adult patients with diffuse gliomas (e.g., Glioblastoma, Astrocytoma, Oligodendroglioma) enrolled in clinical trials or routine care.
Standardizes the MRI interpretation of T1 gadolinium-enhancing and T2/FLAIR non-enhancing disease.

How it Works

Response Criteria

CategoryEnhancing Disease (T1+C)Non-Enhancing Disease (T2/FLAIR)
Complete Response (CR)Disappearance of all enhancementStable or improved
Partial Response (PR)≥ 50% decrease in sum of products of diametersStable or improved
Progressive Disease (PD)≥ 25% increase, OR new lesionsSignificant increase
Stable Disease (SD)Does not qualify for CR, PR, or PDStable

Clinical Pearls

The 12-Week Rule (Pseudoprogression)

Within the first 12 weeks after completing chemoradiation, an increase in contrast enhancement cannot be called Progressive Disease (PD) unless the new enhancement is outside the radiation field or proven by biopsy. This prevents prematurely stopping effective temozolomide due to harmless radiation-induced inflammation.

Corticosteroid Nuance

To achieve a CR or PR, the patient must be off corticosteroids (or on a stable/decreasing physiological dose). Steroids shrink blood vessels, reducing contrast leakage and falsely improving the scan without killing a single tumor cell.

The Evidence

Key Reference

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Clinical Trials (RANO 2.0)

Wen PY et al. • Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2023;41(33):5187-5199

Last Comprehensive Review: 2026

Related Tools

CNS-IPI
NSCLC GPA
Oncology CalculatorsInternal Medicine CalculatorsEmergency Medicine Calculators
Have feedback about this calculator?Let us know.

Recent Journal Updates

CancerJul 23, 2026
Outcomes of loncastuximab tesirine in heavily pretreated patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, including the post‐CAR T‐cell therapy setting: A meta‐analysis

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to RANO 2.0 for Gliomas.

PLOS MedicineJul 22, 2026
Whose fears count? Legitimacy, trust and viral outbreak responses after COVID-19

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to RANO 2.0 for Gliomas.

British J HaematologyJul 17, 2026
Infectious adverse events associated with novel Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in adults with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Clinical Context

We think this has broad domain relevance to RANO 2.0 for Gliomas.